by Daniel Lawler
The Milky Way: As humanity sets its sights on life in space, scientists are studying procreation without Earth's gravity.
Scientists have used a tiny plastic "obstacle course" to test how much sperm would struggle to navigate during sex in the weightlessness of space.
Some particularly resilient sperm still made it through the course, suggesting that conceiving children in space will still be possible, according to research published on Thursday.
However, a bigger problem could be that the development of embryos after fertilization was harmed by a lack of gravity, the Australian team of researchers found.
With humanity setting its eyes on colonizing space—next week NASA hopes to launch its first crewed mission around the moon in half a century—scientists have been studying how difficult it will be to procreate on spaceships or other worlds.
One of the biggest challenges is that sperm will no longer be pulled downwards by Earth's gravity.
"Sperm need to actively find their way to an egg, and this study is the first to put that ability to the test under space-like conditions," Nicole McPherson, a researcher at Adelaide University in Australia, told AFP.
Civilians enjoy microgravity on an Airbus A330. Sex in space presents many difficulties, chief among them the lack of gravity.
The scientists used a plastic chamber that resembles the female reproductive tract to act as a "miniature obstacle course", the senior author of the new study said.
"Think of it as a tiny race track... sperm are introduced at one end and have to swim their way through to the other."
Filtering out weak runners
Both human and mice sperm were sent down the course, which was inside a device that usesconstant rotationto simulate the microgravity of space.
The sperm was about 50% worse at navigating through the course compared to how they perform under Earth's gravity.
This worked out to be roughly a30% dropin successful fertilization, according to thestudyin the journalCommunications Biology.
However, the sperm that did make it through seemed to produce better-quality embryos, which could turn out to be "beneficial," McPherson said.
It appeared that the stress of microgravity acted as a "filter" that effectively cleared the field, "leaving only the most capable sperm in the running," she explained.
A bigger problem came in the first 24 hours after sperm had fertilized the eggs.
"The results reversed sharply, with fewer embryos formed, and those that did were of poorer quality," McPherson said.
This suggests that microgravity "may not be the deal-breaker we feared, butprotecting the embryofrom weightlessness in those critical first hours will likely be essential for reproduction in space," she added.
Some including billionaire SpaceX founder Elon Musk have ambitious plans to make humans an interplanetary species by establishing settlements on the moon, then Mars.
There has also been speculation that the first baby conceived outside the bounds of Earth could be the result of a couple having sex on a flight launched by the booming space tourism industry.
McPherson emphasized that much more research is needed to understand how reproduction works in space, adding that fertilization is "only one small piece of a very long and complex puzzle".
"We are still a long way from seeing the first space baby."
© 2026 AFP
Publication details Hannah E. Lyons et al, Simulated microgravity alters sperm navigation, fertilization and embryo development in mammals, Communications Biology (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s42003-026-09734-4 Journal information: Communications Biology




Post comments